Showing posts with label veils. Show all posts
Showing posts with label veils. Show all posts

22 March 2007

Islamophobic or Anti-fundamentalist?

Iranian womenJust when you thought the issue of Islam was beginning to disappear from the news, a couple of headlines come along that seem to indicate some kind of sensible balance between tolerance and freedom is now being achieved:

Schools allowed to ban face veils

Schools will be able to ban pupils from wearing full-face veils on security, safety or learning grounds under new uniforms guidance issued by ministers.
French cartoons editor acquitted

A French court has ruled in favour of the editor of a satirical magazine accused of insulting Muslims by reprinting cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, saying the cartoons were covered by freedom of expression laws and were not an attack on Islam, but fundamentalists.

22 February 2007

Islam: Veiled in Controversy

Zilla Huma Usman (credit: www.digitaljournal.com)
Zilla Huma Usman,
shot dead Tuesday
The debate sparked last year by Jack Straw about the wearing of veils in public by Muslim women continues to rage. In the latest episode of this ongoing saga, the High Court has rejected demands brought by a 12-year-old in Buckinghamshire that she be allowed to wear niqab, the full-face veil, during school lessons. Meanwhile, in Pakistan, Zilla Huma Usman, Punjab's Minister for Social Welfare and a strong campaigner for women's rights, has been assassinated by a gunman for not wearing a Muslim veil.

At a time when the Muslim Council of Britain is calling for our schools to make concessions to Islamic cultural norms, we would be wise to heed the warning of Britain's most senior Muslim peer, Lord Ahmed of Rotherham:
“The face veil is a barrier to integration in the West. The veil is now a mark of separation, segregation and defiance against mainstream British culture. There’s nothing in the Koran to say that wearing a niqab is desirable, let alone compulsory. It’s purely cultural. It’s an identity thing which has been misinterpreted. They were supposed to be worn so that women wouldn’t be harassed. But women, and communities as a whole, are now being harassed because they are wearing them."