Showing posts with label infertility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label infertility. Show all posts

02 August 2007

Saviour Siblings or Spare-part Kids?

test tube babyFirst, prospective parents could attempt to have a baby by in vitro fertilisation.

Next, parents were permitted to screen test-tube embryos to seek a match for an existing child with a potentially terminal illness.

Now the parliamentary committee charged with reviewing the Human Tissue and Embryos Bill is proposing that parents should be allowed to create so-called "saviour siblings" in an attempt to treat older brothers and sisters with non-life-threatening conditions.

What do you think? Should we heed the transhumanists and embrace every technological chance to improve on the design of humans? Or is this just another example of the slippery slope, another step towards creating "designer babies"?

17 May 2007

Chimera Ban Lifted

As widely expected, the Government has caved in to pressure over its proposed chimera research ban and will now permit the creation of "inter-species entities"—that is, human-animal hybrid embryos—for research.

Regulars of this blog will be familiar with fears that Britain's apparent dismissal of a number of international ethical agreements means we increasingly risk becoming known as an ethical rogue state. It will be interesting to see what feedback we receive from international sources over this latest draft Human Tissue and Embryos Bill.

The changes also remove a baby's right to a father, affording single women and lesbian couples in a civil partnership with the same "human rights" as married women, meaning that it will be easier for them to receive IVF treatment.

Afternoon UPDATE: Here's the first of the American commentary on today's Government U-turn: The Island Of Dr. Moreau, which asks "What happened to all of the European concern over genetic purity?"—a good question, in view of the European Parliament's decision at the end of last month to adopt new rules authorising so-called "advanced therapies" (adult stem-cell therapy, gene therapy, and tissue engineering) despite "considerable misgivings from some MEPs over ethical questions," principally from members in Eastern Europe, Italy and Germany, who warned "If Europe rightly wants to set human rights standards in the world, it can not afford to adopt a 'passive position' when it comes to advanced therapies."

04 April 2007

IVF Debate

HFEA: The best possible start to lifeJohn Humphrys noted this morning that having children is not a right. Given that:

  1. IVF carries serious long-term risks for both mother and any children arising from the procedure especially, we learn today, if multiple eggs are implanted,
  2. Infertility is not a condition that poses any risks or handicaps to the individual or couple affected, and
  3. There are approximately 4,000 children currently waiting for adoption placements in the UK,
I do wonder whether NHS resources (i.e. money raised from tax-payers) ought not to be focused on those who are suffering from genuine illness and disease.